November 2, 2014
Posted by on
Our weekly SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, October 27, 2014 will be a discussion of two recent California District Court Cases:
Reinicke v. Creative Empire LLC, Case No. 12-vc-1405 (S.D. Cal 10/22/14) (available here). Here, the district court denied CE’s motion for an award of fees and costs despite Plaintiff’s inability to establish copyright infringement. The Court held there was a reasonable legal and factual basis to support the copyright infringement claim. Further, the court did not want to discourage individual language developers from asserting copyright ownership.
Ziptronix v. OmniVision Tech., Case No. 10-05525 (ND Cal 10/21/14) (available here). Here, Ziptronix sued OmniVision, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd and TSMC North America Corp. (both referred to as “TSMC”) for nine counts of patent infringement involving image sensor technology used in smartphones. TSMC prevailed on summary judgment because the subject wafers –thin slices of semiconductor material, such as a crystalline silicon, used in electronics — were not sold within the United States. Ziptronix’s position that TSMC and OmniVision negotiated and executed contracts for the sale of the wafers in the United States failed as the Court held that the contracts contemplated delivery and performance outside the US.
All are invited to join us in our discussion during the SoCal IP Institute meeting on Monday, November 3, 2014 at Noon in our Westlake Village office. This activity is approved for 1 hour of MCLE credit. If you will be joining us, please RSVP to Noelle Smith by 9 am Monday morning.